Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Nov 22, 2022

Backport of #78665 to release/7.0

/cc @bartonjs

Customer Impact

Customers upgrading NuGet package references from 6.0.x to 7.0.0 find that the System.Security.Cryptography.Xml and System.Threading.AccessControl packages no longer work on .NET Framework, generally manifesting as a TypeLoadException when used by an intermediate library built targeting .NET Standard 2.0

Testing

Built the release/7.0 branch with this change applied, extracted the lib/net462 DLL for each package, and verified all of the typeforwards are present in the updated versions.

Risk

Low.

IMPORTANT: Is this backport for a servicing release? If so and this change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, please make certain that you have added any necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 22, 2022

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-infrastructure-libraries
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #78665 to release/7.0

/cc @bartonjs

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: Is this backport for a servicing release? If so and this change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, please make certain that you have added any necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author: github-actions[bot]
Assignees: -
Labels:

area-Infrastructure-libraries

Milestone: -

Copy link
Contributor

@carlossanlop carlossanlop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes look good. This is tell-mode, no need to send email to Tactics.

@ViktorHofer do we need any special additional changes for the servicing on these two packages?

@carlossanlop carlossanlop added this to the 7.0.x milestone Nov 22, 2022
@bartonjs bartonjs added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Nov 22, 2022
@bartonjs
Copy link
Member

This is tell-mode, no need to send email to Tactics.

If that means I should have picked a label other than servicing-consider, then please fix my metadata 😄.

@carlossanlop carlossanlop added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Nov 23, 2022
@carlossanlop carlossanlop merged commit 12cf8b0 into release/7.0 Nov 23, 2022
@carlossanlop carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-78665-to-release/7.0 branch November 23, 2022 20:39
@ViktorHofer
Copy link
Member

It's a regression in product code from a previous release which doesn't sound like a tell-mode change. Anyways, I see that the servicing-approved label got added so I assume Tactics already approved it.

@carlossanlop carlossanlop removed the Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release label Nov 28, 2022
@mmitche
Copy link
Member

mmitche commented Nov 28, 2022

This isn't making December, it will make Jan.

@carlossanlop
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, that's alright. I just merged it in advance.

@carlossanlop carlossanlop modified the milestones: 7.0.x, 7.0.2 Nov 28, 2022
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 28, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants