DataGridColumnBorder caching of Freezable brushes is not actually caching anything at all #6714
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #6713
Description
CacheFreezable() logic is incorrect in that it checks if the indexed value is NOT null before caching versus if it IS null. This means that values will never actually be cached and any calls to GetCachedFreezable() will always return null causing the Brush to be regenerated rather than reused on every rendering pass.
Customer Impact
Unnecessary computation on every rendering pass. Possible memory and brush leak.
Regression
Does not appear to be a regression.
Testing
Validated fix locally in private implementation of DataGridColumnBorder
Risk
This should be minimal. DataGridColumnBorder code was clearly implemented assuming that brushes will be cached but they never actually are. There are various assertions in place already to ensure proper behavior here.
Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow