bitdefender: Add jsonRPC format as recommended default.#10381
Conversation
|
Pinging @elastic/security-service-integrations (Team:Security-Service Integrations) |
| {{else}} | ||
| program: | | ||
| has(obj.jsonrpc) ? | ||
| dyn({ | ||
| "error": { | ||
| "message": "Unable to process message. Received jsonrpc formatted message, but setting `Enable jsonRPC Format` is disabled." | ||
| } | ||
| }) | ||
| : | ||
| obj |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm not sure about this part; the CEL processing is more expensive than the direct publication. Do you think that the error message here carries its weight beyond what would be seen without? A possible alternative seems like it should be possible in the ingest pipeline; test there for the presence of the json.jsonrpc field and add this same message then. The difference would be that the agent doesn't know about it. This difference may be significant when the status updates are added to the http_endpoint input.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I ended up removing the user option to enable/disable the jsonrpc format. The input now parses all 3 formats jsonrpc, qradar or splunk without any fail processors in ingest pipeline. Change in 5867fdf. Let me know if this sounds good.
| - name: enable_jsonrpc_format | ||
| type: bool | ||
| title: Enable jsonRPC Format. | ||
| description: Enable this flag if events are in BitDefender's jsonRPC format. For details, see [documentation](https://www.bitdefender.com/business/support/en/77209-135325-push-event-json-rpc-messages.html). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The text here says "enable this … if", but it is already on by default. Suggest "Enable processing events in BitDefender's jsonRPC format."?
Do we want this option on by default?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I will change the description. Initially I added it as default: false and its description accordingly.
But after talking to Bitdefender folks, they recommend using this format as default. So, I changed the default: true and incremented major version to indicate this is a breaking change. I forgot to update the description accordingly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Removed this option all together
#10381 (comment)
🚀 Benchmarks reportPackage
|
| Data stream | Previous EPS | New EPS | Diff (%) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
push_configuration |
29411.76 | 23809.52 | -5602.24 (-19.05%) | 💔 |
To see the full report comment with /test benchmark fullreport
💚 Build Succeeded
History
|
|
|
Package bitdefender - 2.0.0 containing this change is available at https://epr.elastic.co/search?package=bitdefender |
Add support for `jsonRPC` format.
After input limitation in processing `jsonRPC` is removed, this PR
adds support to process `jsonRPC` formatted events and also suggests
making this as default format as recommended by BitDefender.
- Update docs to indicate `jsonRPC` is recommended default.
- Increment major version to support this breaking change
making jsonRPC as default recommended.
Add support for `jsonRPC` format.
After input limitation in processing `jsonRPC` is removed, this PR
adds support to process `jsonRPC` formatted events and also suggests
making this as default format as recommended by BitDefender.
- Update docs to indicate `jsonRPC` is recommended default.
- Increment major version to support this breaking change
making jsonRPC as default recommended.
Proposed commit message
Checklist
changelog.ymlfile.Author's Checklist
How to test this PR locally
$ eval "$(elastic-package stack shellinit)" && elastic-package test pipeline --generate -v --data-streams=push_notifications$ eval "$(elastic-package stack shellinit)" && elastic-package test system --generate -v --data-streams=push_notificationsRelated issues
Screenshots