Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@gomoripeti
Copy link
Contributor

It is already allowed in match-specs.

It is already allowed in match-specs.
@sverker sverker self-assigned this Sep 25, 2018
@sverker sverker added team:VM Assigned to OTP team VM fix labels Sep 25, 2018
@sverker
Copy link
Contributor

sverker commented Sep 25, 2018

May I suggest a rebase on maint for OTP-21.2.

git rebase --onto maint master

@gomoripeti gomoripeti changed the base branch from master to maint September 25, 2018 21:50
@gomoripeti
Copy link
Contributor Author

sorry, I chose the wrong target branch, now it should be maint

@sverker sverker added the testing currently being tested, tag is used by OTP internal CI label Sep 26, 2018
@sverker
Copy link
Contributor

sverker commented Sep 26, 2018

I see that byte_size is missing totally, but that would be another PR.

@gomoripeti
Copy link
Contributor Author

yes, byte_size is not even there in the PAM program interpreter. I wouldn't have dared to be so lazy to not add tests if I'd modified that part. And bit_size is good enough for most of (my) use-cases with bytestrings/Elixir strings.

@sverker sverker merged commit 0cb5456 into erlang:maint Oct 4, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

fix team:VM Assigned to OTP team VM testing currently being tested, tag is used by OTP internal CI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants