ESC-50 classification with BEATs#5977
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5977 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 47.48% 47.44% -0.05%
==========================================
Files 529 530 +1
Lines 47850 47936 +86
==========================================
+ Hits 22721 22742 +21
- Misses 25129 25194 +65
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
This is ready for review. |
ftshijt
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the update! I left some minor comments
|
Hi, should I be doing anything else on this PR? (The failing test seems to be due to time out, iiuc) |
|
Thanks for reviewing this PR. |
|
Please fix this issue |
|
Thanks, @Shikhar-S! |
ESC-50 classification with BEATs
What?
Why?
Status
Current results
Ours:
93.8%94.8%BEATs: 95.6 (Table 1 from this paper)
Edit: This difference means 3.2 additional examples are wrong (test set is of size 400). Not sure if this is significant.
Current setup is missing:
Roll augmentationAddedSpecAugment on frequency bandsTunedSee also
ESC-50 data prep code is adapted from #5410
Uses BEATs implementation from #5915