Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@CharlesStratusnet
Copy link

@CharlesStratusnet CharlesStratusnet commented Dec 20, 2025

This is a draft EIP for stateless block witnesses.

@github-actions github-actions bot added c-new Creates a brand new proposal s-draft This EIP is a Draft t-core labels Dec 20, 2025
@eth-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eth-bot commented Dec 20, 2025

File EIPS/eip-4942.md

Requires 1 more reviewers from @g11tech, @jochem-brouwer, @lightclient, @SamWilsn

@eth-bot eth-bot added e-consensus Waiting on editor consensus e-review Waiting on editor to review labels Dec 20, 2025
@eth-bot eth-bot changed the title Add draft EIP for stateless block witnesses Add EIP: Stateless Block Witnesses with Verkle Proofs Dec 20, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

The commit 3ccfd88 (as a parent of 3f69e04) contains errors.
Please inspect the Run Summary for details.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the w-ci Waiting on CI to pass label Dec 20, 2025
@@ -0,0 +1,306 @@
---
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
---
---
eip: 8108

Assigning next sequential EIP/ERC/RIP number.
Numbers are assigned by editors & associates.

Please also update the filename.

title: Stateless Block Witnesses with Verkle Proofs
description: Defines an optional mechanism for including state witnesses in blocks to enable stateless block verification using Verkle proofs.
author: Charles Cohen (@CharlesStratusnet)
discussions-to: https://ethereum-magicians.org
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please create a discussions topic using the template: https://ethereum-magicians.org/c/eips/5

Copy link
Contributor

@g11tech g11tech left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this EIP 6800 in combo with 4762 is already there, justify how this is different or close the PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

c-new Creates a brand new proposal e-consensus Waiting on editor consensus e-review Waiting on editor to review s-draft This EIP is a Draft t-core w-ci Waiting on CI to pass

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants