Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Update EIP-7377: clarify storage tuple processing in EIP-7377 #10982

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
forkfury wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update EIP-7377: clarify storage tuple processing in EIP-7377 #10982

forkfury wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@forkfury
Copy link
Contributor

@forkfury forkfury commented Dec 25, 2025

Fix

Clarifies ambiguous wording in the storage tuple processing specification that could be misinterpreted.

Changes

  • Replaces "for each tuple in tx.storage and the sender's storage trie" with explicit "for each tuple (slot, value) in tx.storage"
  • Removes non-standard t.first/t.second notation in favor of descriptive tuple structure (slot, value)
  • Makes it clear that only tuples from tx.storage are processed, not the existing storage trie

@forkfury forkfury requested a review from eth-bot as a code owner December 25, 2025 07:38
@github-actions github-actions bot added c-update Modifies an existing proposal s-stagnant This EIP is Stagnant t-core labels Dec 25, 2025
@eth-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eth-bot commented Dec 25, 2025 •
edited
Loading

File EIPS/eip-7377.md

Requires 1 more reviewers from @adietrichs, @lightclient, @SamWilsn
Requires 1 more reviewers from @g11tech, @jochem-brouwer, @lightclient, @SamWilsn

@eth-bot eth-bot added the a-review Waiting on author to review label Dec 25, 2025
@eth-bot eth-bot changed the title fix: clarify storage tuple processing in EIP-7377 Update EIP-7377: clarify storage tuple processing in EIP-7377 Dec 25, 2025
g11tech
g11tech reviewed Dec 27, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@g11tech g11tech left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

need author to confirm PR first, seems like a change/correction tech semantics

@wwwarsalanlakzaee-del
Copy link

wwwarsalanlakzaee-del commented Dec 28, 2025 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@g11tech g11tech g11tech left review comments

@eth-bot eth-bot Awaiting requested review from eth-bot eth-bot is a code owner

At least 0 approving reviews are required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

a-review Waiting on author to review c-update Modifies an existing proposal s-stagnant This EIP is Stagnant t-core

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@forkfury @eth-bot @wwwarsalanlakzaee-del @g11tech