feat: introduce equatable_lint package #206
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
d935494 to
71c5469
Compare
ricardodalarme
commented
Nov 18, 2025
| } | ||
|
|
||
| Set<String>? _extractPropsNames(FunctionBody body) { | ||
| if (body is! ExpressionFunctionBody) return null; |
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
TODO: also include a check for BlockFunctionBody. IMO we could do that in a later PR
71c5469 to
4a009bd
Compare
4a009bd to
7e7e6a2
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Status
READY
Breaking Changes
NO
Description
Introduce
equatable_lintpackage using the new Analyzer system. It also includes a very firstdo_include_all_fields_in_propslint rule.Related Issue
Impact to Remaining Code Base
We might want to move the current equatable code to
packages/equatableVisual Reference