Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@samtstern
Copy link
Contributor

@samtstern samtstern requested a review from rsgowman March 31, 2020 14:28
@samtstern
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rsgowman could you take a look at these? Even nitpicks on naming/comments are useful because once you approve of these I will use them as a template for the snippets in other languages.

displayName: 'updatedName',
emailSignInConfig: {
enabled: false, // Disable email provider.
},
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Originally, I had thought to just piggy-back the enablement of anon authentication docs into the existing create/update tenant docs. My reasoning was that this is just another parameter, not really much different than (eg) emailSignInConfig. If you did that here, you could get rid of the enableAnonAuth snippet entirely. (No objection to keeping it separate either though.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants