Use variable instead of multiple accesses through a map #122178
Conversation
|
It looks like this pull request may not have tests. Please make sure to add tests before merging. If you need an exemption to this rule, contact Hixie on the #hackers channel in Chat (don't just cc him here, he won't see it! He's on Discord!). If you are not sure if you need tests, consider this rule of thumb: the purpose of a test is to make sure someone doesn't accidentally revert the fix. Ask yourself, is there anything in your PR that you feel it is important we not accidentally revert back to how it was before your fix? Reviewers: Read the Tree Hygiene page and make sure this patch meets those guidelines before LGTMing. |
|
test-exempt: No semantic change |
|
rescheduled 2 try jobs that timed out |
|
@christopherfujino or @eliasyishak Can someone of you add the autosubmit label since I can't add it myself? Or is there something missing from my side? |
Use variable instead of multiple accesses through a map
Instead of accessing the same variable through the map multiple times, use the variable which is also statically checked.
Pre-launch Checklist
///).If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on Discord.