Fix KeySet<T> (and LogicalKeySet) hashCode calculation #38936
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This fixes the
hashCode
calculation forKeySet<T>
so that it doesn't depend on the insertion order of the keys in the set.The fix involves switching from
Set<T>
toHashSet<T>
internally, so that the iteration order is stable around the hash values of the inserted keys, and not the insertion order. This matters whenhashList
is called inKeySet<T>.hashCode
to build the hash value of the contents of the internal set.Related Issues
#38919
Tests
hashCode
calculation both from the up-to-four key constructor, and thefromSet
constructor.Checklist
Before you create this PR confirm that it meets all requirements listed below by checking the relevant checkboxes (
[x]
). This will ensure a smooth and quick review process.///
).flutter analyze --flutter-repo
) does not report any problems on my PR.Breaking Change
Does your PR require Flutter developers to manually update their apps to accommodate your change?