This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 22, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.8k
[camera] Adding check for null before creating capture session. #2965
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: you could invert the if statement to reduce nesting and would make it a bit easier to expand the method:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking further into this issue, it would be good to know why
pictureImageReader
is null at this point and if that is valid (as @tvolkert also mentioned in his comments on PR #2871 ).If the
pictureImageReader
should not be null whenstartPreview
is called, this code will hide a mistake that is somewhere else in the code. I will start looking into this.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks Maurits for looking into this! I agree that this is only a workaround for a symptom, but not a proper fix. Do you have a hunch where the real problem could lie?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @panmari, we (me and a colleague) have been looking into this issue and can't quite reproduce it as of yet. We do have 2 theories at the moment:
onOpened
callback would be called when thedispose
method has already been run (race condition).I am currently discussing on how we should approach these problems.