Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 22, 2023. It is now read-only.

[path_provider] Use a different Android channel name #4912

Merged

Conversation

stuartmorgan-g
Copy link
Contributor

Reverts the channel name reversion from 2.0.11, so that it is using a
different channel name from the shared method channel (to avoid
confusion if they diverge over time), as originally intended.

Includes the update to 2.8 as a minimum Flutter version, which was
forgotten in the original change.

Pre-launch Checklist

  • I read the Contributor Guide and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs.
  • I read the Tree Hygiene wiki page, which explains my responsibilities.
  • I read and followed the relevant style guides and ran the auto-formatter. (Unlike the flutter/flutter repo, the flutter/plugins repo does use dart format.)
  • I signed the CLA.
  • The title of the PR starts with the name of the plugin surrounded by square brackets, e.g. [shared_preferences]
  • I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above.
  • I updated pubspec.yaml with an appropriate new version according to the pub versioning philosophy, or this PR is exempt from version changes.
  • I updated CHANGELOG.md to add a description of the change, following repository CHANGELOG style.
  • I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with ///).
  • I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is test-exempt.
  • All existing and new tests are passing.

Reverts the channel name reversion from 2.0.11, so that it is using a
different channel name from the shared method channel (to avoid
confusion if they diverge over time), as originally intended.
@@ -52,14 +52,6 @@ void main() {
log.clear();
});

// TODO(stuartmorgan): Change this to a test that it uses a different name,
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I removed it rather than changing it, since the reverse test didn't seem to actually be useful (and we don't have it anywhere else). I could add it if you think it's worthwhile though.

Copy link
Contributor

@bparrishMines bparrishMines left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
p: path_provider platform-android waiting for tree to go green (Use "autosubmit") This PR is approved and tested, but waiting for the tree to be green to land.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants