Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Rate limit for log items #4373

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: feat/java-log-feature
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

adinauer
Copy link
Member

@adinauer adinauer commented May 6, 2025

#skip-changelog

📜 Description

Rate limit for log items

💡 Motivation and Context

💚 How did you test it?

📝 Checklist

  • I added tests to verify the changes.
  • No new PII added or SDK only sends newly added PII if sendDefaultPII is enabled.
  • I updated the docs if needed.
  • I updated the wizard if needed.
  • Review from the native team if needed.
  • No breaking change or entry added to the changelog.
  • No breaking change for hybrid SDKs or communicated to hybrid SDKs.

🔮 Next steps

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 6, 2025

🚨 Detected changes in high risk code 🚨

High-risk code has higher potential to break the SDK and may be hard to test. To prevent severe bugs, apply the rollout process for releasing such changes and be extra careful when changing and reviewing these files:

  • sentry/src/main/java/io/sentry/transport/RateLimiter.java

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 6, 2025

Messages
📖 Do not forget to update Sentry-docs with your feature once the pull request gets approved.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 27a24ec

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 6, 2025

Performance metrics 🚀

  Plain With Sentry Diff
Startup time 438.10 ms 447.22 ms 9.12 ms
Size 1.58 MiB 2.08 MiB 507.48 KiB

Copy link
Member

@lcian lcian left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants