Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Send init-post status report in absence of config #2751

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 3, 2025
Merged

Send init-post status report in absence of config #2751

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 3 additions & 2 deletions lib/init-action-post.js
View file
Open in desktop

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion lib/init-action-post.js.map
View file
Open in desktop

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

19 changes: 9 additions & 10 deletions src/init-action-post.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -67,17 +67,16 @@ async function runWrapper() {
logger.warning(
"Debugging artifacts are unavailable since the 'init' Action failed before it could produce any.",
);
return;
} else {
uploadFailedSarifResult = await initActionPostHelper.run(
debugArtifacts.tryUploadAllAvailableDebugArtifacts,
printDebugLogs,
config,
repositoryNwo,
features,
logger,
);
}
Comment on lines +70 to 79
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this correct? I think this still doesn't send a status report if there's no config. Would this work?

Suggested change
} else {
uploadFailedSarifResult = await initActionPostHelper.run(
debugArtifacts.tryUploadAllAvailableDebugArtifacts,
printDebugLogs,
config,
repositoryNwo,
features,
logger,
);
}
}
uploadFailedSarifResult = await initActionPostHelper.run(
debugArtifacts.tryUploadAllAvailableDebugArtifacts,
printDebugLogs,
config,
repositoryNwo,
features,
logger,
);

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's correct — the status report is sent later on in the file, but the original code was returning early so it was never sent.

The suggested change won't work because config is required to upload debug artifacts 😄

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The return is the problem. We won't be able to upload a failed SARIF file if we don't have a config, because we need CodeQL to do that. But we should still upload a status report, and the status report code comes at the end of the runWrapper function.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah...got it. I only reviewed the changed bits, so I missed what's happening later. LGTM.


uploadFailedSarifResult = await initActionPostHelper.run(
debugArtifacts.tryUploadAllAvailableDebugArtifacts,
printDebugLogs,
config,
repositoryNwo,
features,
logger,
);
} catch (unwrappedError) {
const error = wrapError(unwrappedError);
core.setFailed(error.message);
Expand Down
Loading