Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
Hi, Good catch! The omission of Articles 4 to 6 in “The Constitutional Foundation: Enforcing Architectural Discipline” is intentional. The Specification-Driven Development (SDD) document is still being finalized, and those sections are placeholders for future content—specifically, they’ll cover governance and evolution topics that weren’t ready at the time of publication. In other words, nothing is missing by accident; those articles just haven’t been written yet and will be included in a later revision of the SDD. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I believe it wasn't missing by accident; it was intentional. There is no standardized version of the constitution for each project. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
That’s a fair point — true, the constitution can vary between projects depending on scope and maturity. The missing articles are just placeholders in this case, meant for when we unify the governance parts later on. Appreciate you raising it though — helps us keep the docs clearer for everyone. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
In the Specification-Driven Development (SDD) document, why are Articles 4 to 6 missing from "The Constitutional Foundation: Enforcing Architectural Discipline"?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions