Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

Hankier
Copy link
Contributor

@Hankier Hankier commented Mar 1, 2022

@Hankier
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hankier commented Mar 1, 2022

Not sure if its a proper solution, really hard to test it as module is complicated.

Goal is to change behaviour of module only in case that someone set variable to null then, none EBS device should be created. In any other cases it should work as before.

@Hankier Hankier force-pushed the fix_additional_ebs branch from fce77ba to dfa22e8 Compare March 1, 2022 10:49
@npalm
Copy link
Member

npalm commented Mar 3, 2022

Can you share some config how you setup the ebs? Are you using an AMI (ubuntu) I guess?

@Hankier
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hankier commented Mar 3, 2022

Can you share some config how you setup the ebs? Are you using an AMI (ubuntu) I guess?

We are using ubuntu AMI and dont setup ebs (module takes default) in that case which is {} and ebs with default values is created.

@npalm npalm self-requested a review March 3, 2022 16:32
@npalm npalm changed the title Add possibility to not create ebs feat(runners): Add possibility to not create ebs Mar 3, 2022
@npalm
Copy link
Member

npalm commented Mar 3, 2022

Thx, will check asap

@Hankier
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hankier commented Mar 7, 2022

Thx, will check asap

@npalm have you managed to check it?

Copy link
Member

@npalm npalm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Hunqer thanks LGTM

@npalm npalm merged commit 33fc32e into github-aws-runners:develop Mar 10, 2022
@Hankier Hankier deleted the fix_additional_ebs branch March 11, 2022 14:33
ulich pushed a commit to ulich/terraform-aws-github-runner that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2022
Co-authored-by: Grzegorz Cwiklinski <[email protected]@smartpension.co.uk>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants