Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

py: Implement range M__getitem__ #47

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 3, 2019
Merged

py: Implement range M__getitem__ #47

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 3, 2019

Conversation

corona10
Copy link
Collaborator

@corona10 corona10 commented Jan 1, 2019

Fixes: #46

@corona10 corona10 requested a review from a team January 1, 2019 05:53
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 1, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #47 into master will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 73.33%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #47      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   65.95%   65.96%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          57       57              
  Lines       10208    10223      +15     
==========================================
+ Hits         6733     6744      +11     
- Misses       3002     3004       +2     
- Partials      473      475       +2
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
py/range.go 80.24% <73.33%> (-1.58%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c140988...0cf77c6. Read the comment docs.

@corona10
Copy link
Collaborator Author

corona10 commented Jan 2, 2019

@ncw PTAL

@ncw
Copy link
Collaborator

ncw commented Jan 3, 2019

Looks perfect - well done :-)

@ncw ncw merged commit 9985b49 into go-python:master Jan 3, 2019
@corona10 corona10 deleted the gh-46 branch January 4, 2019 00:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants