Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@michaelkedar
Copy link
Member

Tried to get Gemini to detect relevant changes in osv-scalibr to add to the changelog. Seems to have done a decent enough job (but required a decent amount of manual editing).

@michaelkedar michaelkedar requested review from Ly-Joey, another-rex, cuixq and jess-lowe and removed request for another-rex November 18, 2025 03:50
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 18, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 67.80%. Comparing base (b32306c) to head (4454a15).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2350   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   67.80%   67.80%           
=======================================
  Files         171      171           
  Lines       13005    13005           
=======================================
  Hits         8818     8818           
  Misses       3502     3502           
  Partials      685      685           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

CHANGELOG.md Outdated

- [Feature #2321](https://github.com/google/osv-scanner/pull/2321) Add support for license checks for RubyGems.
- [Feature #2294](https://github.com/google/osv-scanner/pull/2294) Replace `requirementsenhanceable` extractor with transitive enricher.
- [Feature #1417](https://github.com/google/osv-scanner/issues/1417) Add `packagedeprecation` enricher to check for deprecated packages. (`--experimental-plugins=packagedeprecation`)
Copy link
Member Author

@michaelkedar michaelkedar Nov 19, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this packagedeprecation result being diplayed in the osv-scanner output anywhere?
@another-rex @Ly-Joey ?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point, let's hide this for now as well. I'll make an issue to track it here.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Made: #2354

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, thought it was just a feature request in osv-scalibr, not scanner. Ah well.

@michaelkedar michaelkedar merged commit b0b6027 into google:main Nov 19, 2025
17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants