-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 507
chore: OSV-Scanner Release 2.3.0 #2350
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2350 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 67.80% 67.80%
=======================================
Files 171 171
Lines 13005 13005
=======================================
Hits 8818 8818
Misses 3502 3502
Partials 685 685 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
81be1b9 to
c264e23
Compare
Co-authored-by: Rex P <[email protected]>
CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| - [Feature #2321](https://github.com/google/osv-scanner/pull/2321) Add support for license checks for RubyGems. | ||
| - [Feature #2294](https://github.com/google/osv-scanner/pull/2294) Replace `requirementsenhanceable` extractor with transitive enricher. | ||
| - [Feature #1417](https://github.com/google/osv-scanner/issues/1417) Add `packagedeprecation` enricher to check for deprecated packages. (`--experimental-plugins=packagedeprecation`) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this packagedeprecation result being diplayed in the osv-scanner output anywhere?
@another-rex @Ly-Joey ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point, let's hide this for now as well. I'll make an issue to track it here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Made: #2354
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, thought it was just a feature request in osv-scalibr, not scanner. Ah well.
Tried to get Gemini to detect relevant changes in osv-scalibr to add to the changelog. Seems to have done a decent enough job (but required a decent amount of manual editing).