Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

MarkDaoust
Copy link
Collaborator

@MarkDaoust MarkDaoust commented Apr 15, 2025

  1. Update version number for 0.8.5 release
  2. Set "Development Status :: 7 - Inactive"
  3. Next releases will pickup the README as the main page on PyPi, so this will show the current readme's "[DEPRECATED]".
  4. Fix broken samples (all samples pass now).
  5. Fix empty GEMINI_API_KEY="" shadowing "GOOGLE_API_KEY".
  6. Fix tests broken by pydantic 2.11
  7. Remove duplicate/orphaned code broken by pydantic2.11 (responder.py)
  8. Sync readme to match Add Support Plan for the repository and deprecation timeline. deprecated-generative-ai-js#462

Change-Id: Ie0b0f883cbe5c8e5427c1d59c1b96bea0dd62fde
Change-Id: I48f3389565d68bc10f1608980298e6f1e384fc37
@github-actions github-actions bot added status:awaiting review PR awaiting review from a maintainer component:python sdk Issue/PR related to Python SDK labels Apr 15, 2025
Change-Id: Ibfe397dc19d055867bb8c0e87f9ba107867e4289
Change-Id: I1df220253baf1b2171891ba380a0a3dde8e09a8b
Change-Id: I0fdfc084e8c5e88bab8257eef22065ec5a6189ea
Change-Id: Ie697e2f43b2608cadebfd14d806f3898b064cc3b
Change-Id: I51110cf338bd61d8cf40b3e73ece12b34c951d0c
@MarkDaoust MarkDaoust requested review from IvanLH and Annhiluc April 15, 2025 20:19
Copy link
Contributor

@Annhiluc Annhiluc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add reason that google/generativeai/responder.py is deleted to the PR?

Change-Id: I6bc43a471b5558f373f6c514a9dc56a49dd9e677
Change-Id: Ib7aee25dfa0d94fc3c4abd55c28a36211126e883
Change-Id: I8f010a0ff5e45009ce9114d6bfc025e5774c2004
@MarkDaoust
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Add reason that google/generativeai/responder.py is deleted to the PR?

Added to the main description.
Mainly: this was the start of development for a feature that was never completed (forked from content_types.py). It should have been done on a feature branch instead of in main. While the file name doesn't start with an underscore, it's never been mentioned externally.

Anyway, people could be importing it. So maybe this is a bit much to put in a bug fix release. I've copied in the fixed code from content_types.py, minimal update, all the tests pass now.

@MarkDaoust MarkDaoust merged commit f5ac4ed into google-gemini:main Apr 16, 2025
9 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the status:awaiting review PR awaiting review from a maintainer label Apr 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component:python sdk Issue/PR related to Python SDK
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants