Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

tswast
Copy link
Contributor

@tswast tswast commented Aug 18, 2025

Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:

  • Make sure to open an issue as a bug/issue before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate designs, and agree on the general idea
  • Ensure the tests and linter pass
  • Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
  • Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)

Fixes #2264 🦕

@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added size: l Pull request size is large. api: bigquery Issues related to the googleapis/python-bigquery API. labels Aug 18, 2025
@tswast tswast changed the title chore: migrate test_base retry tests chore: execute retry tests serially, since they depend on global time Aug 18, 2025
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added size: xl Pull request size is extra large. and removed size: l Pull request size is large. labels Aug 18, 2025
@tswast tswast marked this pull request as ready for review August 18, 2025 19:23
@tswast tswast requested review from a team as code owners August 18, 2025 19:23
@tswast tswast requested a review from chalmerlowe August 18, 2025 19:23
@tswast

This comment was marked as resolved.

Copy link
Collaborator

@chalmerlowe chalmerlowe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tswast tswast merged commit d41fd5c into main Aug 20, 2025
28 checks passed
@tswast tswast deleted the issue2264-no-parallel-for-retry-tests branch August 20, 2025 19:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: bigquery Issues related to the googleapis/python-bigquery API. size: xl Pull request size is extra large.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

combination of freezegun and parallel tests causes unit tests to flake
2 participants