Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

tswast
Copy link
Collaborator

@tswast tswast commented Dec 29, 2021

…ings

Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:

  • Make sure to open an issue as a bug/issue before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate designs, and agree on the general idea
  • Ensure the tests and linter pass
  • Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
  • Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)

Fixes #373 🦕

@tswast tswast requested a review from a team as a code owner December 29, 2021 19:45
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the api: bigquery Issues related to the googleapis/python-bigquery-sqlalchemy API. label Dec 29, 2021
@tseaver tseaver changed the title test: failing alembic test compares structured objects instead of str… test: compare structured objects instead of strings in alembic test Dec 29, 2021
@tseaver tseaver changed the title test: compare structured objects instead of strings in alembic test test: compare schema fields instead of strings in alembic test Dec 29, 2021
@tswast
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tswast commented Dec 29, 2021

Alembic tests are passing, but got some errors like

sqlalchemy.exc.DatabaseError: (google.cloud.bigquery.dbapi.exceptions.DatabaseError) 400 Column x is not present in table some_table at [1:33]

in the compliance tests. Also a bunch of (new?) warnings with the latest SQLAlchemy 1.4 #385

@tswast tswast merged commit b5a55ab into main Dec 30, 2021
@tswast tswast deleted the issue373-test_alembic_scenario branch December 30, 2021 04:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: bigquery Issues related to the googleapis/python-bigquery-sqlalchemy API.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

tests.system.test_alembic: test_alembic_scenario failed
3 participants