Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

manila: prioritize sharev2 service type #3360

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kayrus
Copy link
Contributor

@kayrus kayrus commented Apr 30, 2025

Fixes #3350

Links to the line numbers/files in the OpenStack source code that support the
code in this PR:

[PUT URLS HERE

@github-actions github-actions bot added edit:gophercloud This PR updates common Gophercloud code semver:patch No API change labels Apr 30, 2025
@kayrus
Copy link
Contributor Author

kayrus commented Apr 30, 2025

@stephenfin do you know how to trigger manila tests?

@kayrus kayrus added the backport-v2 This PR will be backported to v2 label Apr 30, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added edit:actions This PR updates GitHub Actions code edit:testinfra This PR updates testing infrastructure code labels Apr 30, 2025
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Apr 30, 2025

Coverage Status

coverage: 78.691%. remained the same
when pulling 1fc7ddf on kayrus:share-priority
into 1906146 on gophercloud:main.

@stephenfin
Copy link
Contributor

stephenfin commented May 7, 2025

#3350 is a more complicated but IMO more comprehensive fix. Do we want to proceed with that one instead?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport-v2 This PR will be backported to v2 edit:actions This PR updates GitHub Actions code edit:gophercloud This PR updates common Gophercloud code edit:testinfra This PR updates testing infrastructure code semver:patch No API change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants