feat: LabelPropagation without GraphX#587
Merged
SemyonSinchenko merged 3 commits intographframes:masterfrom May 30, 2025
Merged
feat: LabelPropagation without GraphX#587SemyonSinchenko merged 3 commits intographframes:masterfrom
SemyonSinchenko merged 3 commits intographframes:masterfrom
Conversation
Collaborator
Author
|
@SauronShepherd @rjurney Hi there! Could you take a look when you have time? It is a part of #556 |
6 tasks
Collaborator
|
Linking this thread about 2.12 issues: #571 |
james-willis
approved these changes
May 30, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
LabelPropagationwithoutGraphX, based only ongraphframes.lib.PregelmaxBythat implements https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-42856Why are the changes needed?
As described in the issue:
Close #564
Notes
It is not working in 2.12 as well, as
GraphXbased implementation. I have no idea why.