Wordsmith future guidance on reactive negotiation #975
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It may or may not be useful to have an HTTP extension in order to perform reactive negotiation -- one possible approach that does not require an extension would be policy in the user-agent. In the spirit of "less is more", and to not overly constrain our forward-looking statement, just remove the phrase "as an extension".
royfielding
approved these changes
Sep 10, 2021
Member
royfielding
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I almost made the same edit earlier.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It may or may not be useful to have an HTTP extension in order to
perform reactive negotiation -- one possible approach that does not
require an extension would be policy in the user-agent.
In the spirit of "less is more", and to not overly constrain our
forward-looking statement, just remove the phrase "as an extension".
(inspired by follow-up discussions on #914)