Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

mrazauskas
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

The shape of PropertyLikeKeys utility type looks somewhat redundant after #13013. I was not happy with it, hence decided to go for a refactor.

Test plan

PropertyLikeKeys is covered by type test. These and all other type tests should pass.

@@ -374,8 +374,6 @@ expectType<SpyInstance<typeof indexSpiedObject.methodE>>(
spyOn(indexSpiedObject, 'methodE'),
);

expectError(spyOn(indexSpiedObject, 'propertyA'));
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same test is repeating few lines bellow.

@@ -142,6 +142,6 @@ declare const objectProperties: PropertyLikeKeys<SomeObject>;
declare const indexObjectProperties: PropertyLikeKeys<IndexObject>;

expectType<'propertyA' | 'propertyB' | 'propertyC'>(classProperties);
expectType<string>(indexClassProperties);
expectType<string | number>(indexClassProperties);
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fells like string | number is more correct or at least more TypeScriptish.

A note from TS docs: keyof {[k: string]: any} is of type string | number, "because JavaScript object keys are always coerced to a string".

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just checked, TypeScript allows this:

type IndexObject = {
  [key: string]: Record<string, any>;
};

const indexObject: IndexObject = {
  123: {a: 123},

  prop: {b: 'abc'},
};

So it feels like this is correct (or?):

type IndexObject = {
  [key: string]: Record<string, any>;
};

type PropKeys = PropertyLikeKeys<IndexObject>; // `string | number`

Copy link
Member

@SimenB SimenB left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

works for me!

@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.
Please note this issue tracker is not a help forum. We recommend using StackOverflow or our discord channel for questions.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 13, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants