Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Nodefs becomes imagefs on GCI#33520

Merged
k8s-github-robot merged 1 commit into
kubernetes:masterfrom
vishh:33444
Oct 7, 2016
Merged

Nodefs becomes imagefs on GCI#33520
k8s-github-robot merged 1 commit into
kubernetes:masterfrom
vishh:33444

Conversation

@vishh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@vishh vishh commented Sep 26, 2016

Kubelet cannot identify rootfs correctly
For #33444

Enforce Disk based pod eviction with GCI base image in Kubelet

Signed-off-by: Vishnu kannan [email protected]


This change is Reviewable

@vishh vishh added this to the v1.4-nonblocking milestone Sep 26, 2016
@vishh vishh added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. labels Sep 26, 2016
@vishh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

vishh commented Sep 26, 2016

P2 since it needs to be cherry-picked into 1.4 branch soon for stabilizing GCI tests.

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 26, 2016
@dchen1107
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

dchen1107 commented Sep 27, 2016

Checked the new configuration with @dashpole's newly introduced out-of-inode test on gci image, and it works.

LGTM

@dchen1107 dchen1107 added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. cherrypick-candidate labels Sep 27, 2016
@pwittrock pwittrock modified the milestones: v1.4, v1.4-nonblocking Sep 27, 2016
@jessfraz
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

jessfraz commented Oct 5, 2016

@vishh is this something that needs to be in 1.4.1?

@vishh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

vishh commented Oct 6, 2016

@jessfraz Ideally yes. I will try to get the tests to pass tomorrow.

@jessfraz
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

jessfraz commented Oct 6, 2016

Thanks!!

On Wednesday, October 5, 2016, Vish Kannan [email protected] wrote:

@jessfraz https://github.com/jessfraz Ideally yes. I will try to get
the tests to pass tomorrow.


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#33520 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABYNbFOlnT0NXlLQJhpDTO62Wmbx7T7Bks5qxDuQgaJpZM4KHEIO
.

@vishh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

vishh commented Oct 6, 2016

@k8s-bot node e2e test this github issue #IGNORE

@vishh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

vishh commented Oct 6, 2016

@k8s-bot gke e2e test this github issue #IGNORE

@vishh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

vishh commented Oct 6, 2016

@jessfraz Tests are green. 🙏 ing for no flakes.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Jenkins GKE smoke e2e failed for commit e7633d8. Full PR test history.

The magic incantation to run this job again is @k8s-bot gke e2e test this. Please help us cut down flakes by linking to an open flake issue when you hit one in your PR.

@jessfraz
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

jessfraz commented Oct 6, 2016

i think the submit queue is blocked :(

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 2:40 PM, k8s-ci-robot [email protected]
wrote:

Jenkins GKE smoke e2e failed
https://k8s-gubernator.appspot.com/build/kubernetes-jenkins/pr-logs/pull/33520/kubernetes-pull-build-test-e2e-gke/15718/
for commit e7633d8
e7633d8.
Full PR test history http://pr-test.k8s.io/33520.

The magic incantation to run this job again is @k8s-bot gke e2e test this.
Please help us cut down flakes by linking to an open flake issue
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues?q=is:issue+label:kind/flake+is:open
when you hit one in your PR.


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#33520 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABYNbGgQ4NMW0a09NLtCI04xkfxGq36Qks5qxWq7gaJpZM4KHEIO
.

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@k8s-bot test this [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Automatic merge from submit-queue

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot merged commit 86c322e into kubernetes:master Oct 7, 2016
@jessfraz jessfraz added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Oct 7, 2016
@jessfraz
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

jessfraz commented Oct 7, 2016

opened cherrypick here: #34296

k8s-github-robot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2016
#34251-origin-release-1.4

Automatic merge from submit-queue

Automated cherry pick of #33520 #34251 origin release 1.4

Cherry pick of #33520 #34251 on release-1.4.

#33520: nodefs becomes imagefs on GCI since kubelet cannot identify
#34251: Fix nil pointer issue when getting metrics from volume
@jessfraz
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

jessfraz commented Oct 7, 2016

cherry-picked to 1.4 in #34296 so removing cherry-pick candidate

dashpole added a commit to dashpole/kubernetes that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2016
dashpole added a commit to dashpole/kubernetes that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2016
…(root label). Reverted kubernetes#33520, and changed e2e test context to use nodefs
k8s-github-robot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2016
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Cadvisor root path configuration

This solves #33444 and reverts PR #33520.  This takes the root directory and passes it to cadvisor, which sets up the "nodefs" based on the provided path, rather than using "/" as before.

This PR is pending on changes in cadvisor, and will not pass tests until those changes are merged, and cadvisor godeps are updated.

```release-note
kubelet summary rootfs now refers to the filesystem that contains the Kubelet RootDirectory (var/lib/kubelet) instead of cadvisor's rootfs ( / ), since they may be different filesystems.
```
jessfraz pushed a commit to jessfraz/kubernetes that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2016
…(root label). Reverted kubernetes#33520, and changed e2e test context to use nodefs
jessfraz pushed a commit to jessfraz/kubernetes that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2016
…(root label). Reverted kubernetes#33520, and changed e2e test context to use nodefs
shyamjvs pushed a commit to shyamjvs/kubernetes that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2016
…ck-of-#33520-kubernetes#34251-origin-release-1.4

Automatic merge from submit-queue

Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#33520 kubernetes#34251 origin release 1.4

Cherry pick of kubernetes#33520 kubernetes#34251 on release-1.4.

kubernetes#33520: nodefs becomes imagefs on GCI since kubelet cannot identify
kubernetes#34251: Fix nil pointer issue when getting metrics from volume
shyamjvs pushed a commit to shyamjvs/kubernetes that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2016
…(root label). Reverted kubernetes#33520, and changed e2e test context to use nodefs
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants