Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

justinsb
Copy link
Member

Once #8887 merges this should show errors in load balancer creation.

Even before then, it may show another error.

Bug #8892

@justinsb
Copy link
Member Author

Not sure if we're still having e2e failures around loadbalancer creation, but having this in would make it much easier to track these problems down. (Now that we are logging events)

@ixdy
Copy link
Contributor

ixdy commented Jun 18, 2015

Sorry for sitting on this review for so long. Is there a reason you updated only "should be able to change the type and nodeport settings of a service" and not the other specs?

@justinsb
Copy link
Member Author

No worries on delay. It was intended as a clean-up that would also help capture more information on the e2e lakes. if we're not having the e2e problem flakiness any more , I suggest we just punt this to post v1. I can look at applying it more generally, and generally making these tests a bit neater.

@justinsb
Copy link
Member Author

I'm going to this as post-v1; if we're still having the e2e problem we can untag.

@justinsb justinsb added this to the v1.0-post milestone Jun 18, 2015
@bgrant0607 bgrant0607 removed this from the v1.0-post milestone Jul 24, 2015
@wojtek-t
Copy link
Member

@justinsb please rebase

@justinsb justinsb force-pushed the e2e_log_events_on_service_mutation branch from af00802 to 584a6f2 Compare July 26, 2015 22:55
Once kubernetes#8887 merges this should show errors in load balancer creation.

Even before then, it may show another error.

Bug kubernetes#8892
@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jul 26, 2015

GCE e2e build/test passed for commit 584a6f2.

@justinsb
Copy link
Member Author

Rebased. I think shippable looks like a flake (failure relates to mesos)

@justinsb
Copy link
Member Author

@k8s-bot test this please

@justinsb
Copy link
Member Author

Gah.... I'm not sure how to get shippable to retest?

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jul 27, 2015

GCE e2e build/test passed for commit 584a6f2.

@justinsb
Copy link
Member Author

OK, well shippable did retest. And it is proving useful to have the events while I'm trying to understand why this test is failing (in another branch).

@wojtek-t
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@ixdy
Copy link
Contributor

ixdy commented Jul 29, 2015

did you only update should be able to change the type and nodeport settings of a service to use framework because that's what you were actively debugging? there are other specs in service.go which should also probably be using framework.

(The shippable retest was me being sneaky and clicking the "rebuild" button without saying so.)

@justinsb
Copy link
Member Author

@ixdy yes that is correct. I had intended this as a pretty small commit that we could get in to look into the failures that we were seeing in e2e testing occasionally.

Next up would be to integrate some of the functionality of NewWebserverTest into the framework. I wasn't aware of framework when I wrote it, and I think much of NewWebserverTest is duplicative/could be done better by hooking in to framework.

@ixdy ixdy added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 3, 2015
@alex-mohr
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-bot test this [testing build queue, sorry for the noise]

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Aug 4, 2015

GCE e2e build/test failed for commit 584a6f2.

@alex-mohr
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-bot test this [previous run failed; detecting flake.]

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Aug 4, 2015

GCE e2e build/test passed for commit 584a6f2.

@alex-mohr
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-bot test this [contrib/submit-queue: candidate for merging]

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Aug 4, 2015

GCE e2e build/test passed for commit 584a6f2.

@alex-mohr
Copy link
Contributor

Automatic merge from SubmitQueue

alex-mohr added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2015
@alex-mohr alex-mohr merged commit 5068c9f into kubernetes:master Aug 4, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants