OCPBUGS-59523 - Update installation-usage.md to clarify audit log location#3024
Conversation
|
Hi @BhargaviGudi. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
…ation OCPBUGS-59523 - Updated indentaion
521fdea to
e6d8dd0
Compare
|
/ok-to-test |
saschagrunert
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks! The e2e tests are broken right now but I assume we can merge manually if the rest of the CI passes.
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: BhargaviGudi, saschagrunert The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3024 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 45.50% 26.56% -18.95%
===========================================
Files 79 125 +46
Lines 7782 20921 +13139
===========================================
+ Hits 3541 5557 +2016
- Misses 4099 15080 +10981
- Partials 142 284 +142 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
/documentation
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR updates the installation-usage.md documentation to clarify where the audit log file generated by the JsonEnricher is stored. Currently, the documentation does not make it clear that the log file is written to the node's file system (not inside the pod), which can lead to confusion for users monitoring audit logs.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes documentation inconsistency observed when enabling JsonEnricher in the Security Profiles Operator.
Fixes bug: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-59523
Does this PR have test?
N/A — documentation-only change.
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?