Add CITATION.CFF #61
Add CITATION.CFF #61
Conversation
|
I stand corrected. You can see how github interprets the CITATION.CFF file by looking at the code landing page for the branch that is being merged. It seems github doesn't use most of the information provided, but at least it is there. At least for now, only one "citation" is supported, so I went ahead and put the Rev Sci Inst as the most general citation. If there is anything that needs to be changed, particularly with respect to "referenced software packages" or keywords I could/should include, let me know. Else I'm going to merge by end of next week. |
|
As a follow up question, should we ultimately have one of these files in each repository? If we do, would we want to tweak the references section to match the dependencies of that particular repo? |
I've confirmed locally that there are not syntax errors. I do not think everything is complete, but there is enough to indicate what is possible.
|
@philipstarkey Unless you can think of more references to add, I'm ready to merge this one in and move on to other things. |
Here is my first pass at a citation file. I've confirmed locally that there are not syntax errors. I do not think everything is complete, but there is enough to indicate what is possible. Happy to implement any modifications necessary.
As best I can tell, there isn't an obvious way to test how github will process the file other than locally checking that syntax is valid using stuff described here.
This addresses #60, for this repo at least.