Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

feat(perplexity): Created Dedicated Output Parser to Support Reasoning Model Output for perplexity #33670

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

feat(perplexity): Created Dedicated Output Parser to Support Reasoning Model Output for perplexity #33670

wants to merge 8 commits into from
+451 −3

Conversation

@keenborder786
Copy link
Contributor

@keenborder786 keenborder786 commented Oct 25, 2025 •
edited
Loading

@github-actions github-actions bot added integration Related to a provider partner package integration feature labels Oct 25, 2025
@keenborder786
Copy link
Contributor Author

keenborder786 commented Oct 25, 2025

@mdrxy

@keenborder786 keenborder786 changed the title feat(preplexity): Created Dedicated Output Parser to Support Reasoning Model Output for Preplexity feat(perplexity): Created Dedicated Output Parser to Support Reasoning Model Output for perplexity Oct 25, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added feature and removed feature labels Oct 25, 2025
@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Oct 25, 2025 •
edited
Loading

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #33670 will not alter performance

Comparing keenborder786:feat/preplexity_parser (587c618) with master (022fdd5)1

Summary

✅ 1 untouched
⏩ 33 skipped2

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on master (9a09ed0) during the generation of this report, so 022fdd5 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

  2. 33 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

@keenborder786
Copy link
Contributor Author

keenborder786 commented Nov 3, 2025

@ccurme

ccurme
ccurme reviewed Nov 3, 2025
View reviewed changes
@ccurme ccurme self-assigned this Nov 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@ccurme ccurme ccurme left review comments

@mdrxy mdrxy Awaiting requested review from mdrxy mdrxy is a code owner

Assignees

@ccurme ccurme

Labels

feature integration Related to a provider partner package integration

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@keenborder786 @ccurme