Quality of life tweaks #26
Conversation
|
@tiennou Lovely with some quality of life improvements. Both of the first outlined issues, I've also encountered when taking docurium out for a spin.
Any chance of having this reviewed and potentially merged? |
|
Sorry, I've kept piling on for a few years 😉(the commit list above is unordered though). Highlights are :
|
1cd8be3 to
9d88c29
Compare
|
Rebased, I've restored the test suite as well, so tests are "green" all along (thanks @carlosmn Care to review sometime soon ? I'd really like the documentation cleanups in libgit2/libgit2#4530 to be upstreamed, and it's been open for a while now… |
0ef5bca to
6d3cb17
Compare
89733d0 to
e9fbd67
Compare
Due to the `if` we'd return `nil` if the message was not an array.
It seems Clang can arbitrarily raise errors (transient NULL-byte reads from files that exist). Handle those errors by retrying the parsing step 3 times, just in case it goes away.
This is a collection of fixes + features I got while learning how it works.
9f038b0 is the main one. It fixes the rendering mess of bulleted structs comments.
b3a09b3 adds a
cm doc --for=$versionoption so you're not forced to build all versions each time (which is nice 😉).22b9c5c is a style change that makes struct members render like function parameters descriptions. It can be dropped. I was just looking at how the HTML worked.