Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Add CLI option to deploy an appstream file #288

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Korne127
Copy link

This pull request adds a CLI flag to deploy an appstream file. When used, the appstream file under the given path will be copied into usr/share/metainfo. This way, users won't have to create an AppDir and manually add the file to the correct location in order for the AppImage to contain one.
It also adds the -a shortcut to the AppDir flag.

A CLI flag to deploy an appstream file has been added.
When used, the appstream file under the given path is copied into usr/share/metainfo.
This way, users don't have to create an AppDir and manually add the file to the correct location in order for the AppImage to contain one.

Additionally, a -a shortcut has been added to the AppDir flag.
Korne127 added a commit to Korne127/docs.appimage.org that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2024
The linuxdeploy user guide has been rewritten, improved and updated.

In general, the explanation of how linuxdeploy can be used has been massively improved. There is now a clear explanation of the two distinct ways and its easier to understand how to use linuxdeploy without make. The misleading term "Manual packaging" has been removed as well.

Additionally, there are many smaller improvements, namely:
- Documentation on the command line arguments --appstream-file, --appdir, --plugin and --output has been added. (This depends on linuxdeploy/linuxdeploy#288 being merged).
- The introduction has been improved and now explains the core ideas better.
- Additional information about the command line arguments --icon-file and --executable as well as about plugins has been added (and wrong information has been corrected).
- An incorrect link to a different section has been corrected.
- TODOs about further improvements that also affect other sections have been added.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant