[Sema] Fix lifetime extension for temporaries in range-based for loops in C++23 #145164
Conversation
…s in C++23 C++23 mandates that temporaries used in range-based for loops are lifetime-extended to cover the full loop. This patch adds a check for loop variables and compiler- generated `__range` bindings to apply the correct extension. Includes test cases based on examples from CWG900/P2644R1.
|
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project! This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified. If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page. If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write permissions for the repository. In which case you can instead tag reviewers by name in a comment by using If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review by "ping"ing the PR by adding a comment “Ping”. The common courtesy "ping" rate is once a week. Please remember that you are asking for valuable time from other developers. If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide. You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums. |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Done! |
C++23 mandates that temporaries used in range-based for loops are lifetime-extended
to cover the full loop. This patch adds a check for loop variables and compiler-
generated
__rangebindings to apply the correct extension.Includes test cases based on examples from CWG900/P2644R1.
Fixes #109793