Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@ncoghlan
Copy link
Collaborator

Previous imperative approach didn't allow for defining the reverse mapping from server configs to client configs

Part of #33

Previous imperative approach didn't allow for defining
the reverse mapping from server configs to client configs

Part of #33
@github-actions github-actions bot added the CLA signed Indicates that all contributors have signed label Mar 18, 2025
"disabledGpus": [1, 2],
},
},
{"key": "embedding.load.llama.keepModelInMemory", "value": True},
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The actual config contents are unchanged, but the order of the fields is different due to an iteration order change when processing the client config fields. The new ordering means that the fields will mostly be in alphabetical order by config key name on the wire, except when one client config maps to multiple KvConfig fields (in which case those fields will all be grouped together).

@ncoghlan ncoghlan merged commit 1f5340f into main Mar 18, 2025
10 checks passed
@ncoghlan ncoghlan deleted the refactor-kv-config-mapping branch March 18, 2025 14:38
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 18, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

CLA signed Indicates that all contributors have signed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants