WEB-2381 Chore: intake refactor #5752
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily introduce enhancements to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
packages/ui/src/popovers/popover.tsx (2)
42-42: LGTM: Proper usage of new prop, with a minor suggestionThe
buttonRefClassNameis correctly applied using thecnfunction, preserving the existing "w-full" class. This implementation allows for flexible styling while maintaining the current layout.For improved readability, consider separating the class names:
- <div ref={setReferenceElement} className={cn("w-full", buttonRefClassName)}> + <div ref={setReferenceElement} className={cn("w-full", buttonRefClassName)}>This change doesn't affect functionality but might make the code slightly more readable.
Tests and Documentation Missing for
PopoverComponentIt appears that there are no existing tests or documentation for the
Popovercomponent. To ensure the component's reliability and maintainability:
- Add tests to cover the new
buttonRefClassNameprop and any related functionality.- Update documentation to include details about the new prop and its usage within the
Popovercomponent.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-78: Consider updating tests and documentationThe changes to the
Popovercomponent look good overall. They enhance the component's flexibility without introducing breaking changes.To ensure completeness, please verify the following:
- Update any existing tests for the
Popovercomponent to cover the newbuttonRefClassNameprop.- Update the component's documentation (if it exists) to reflect the new prop and its usage.
You can use the following script to check for existing tests and documentation:
This will help ensure that the changes are properly tested and documented.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for existing tests and documentation for the Popover component # Test: Search for test files related to the Popover component echo "Searching for Popover component test files:" fd -e test.tsx -e test.ts -e spec.tsx -e spec.ts | rg -i 'popover' # Test: Search for documentation files that might need updating echo "Searching for potential documentation files:" fd -e md | rg -i 'component|popover'Length of output: 301
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive search for tests and documentation related to the Popover component # Test: Search for test files related to the Popover component with case-insensitive matching echo "Searching for Popover component test files (case-insensitive):" fd -e test.tsx -e test.ts -e spec.tsx -e spec.ts -i | rg -i 'popover' # Test: Search for documentation files that mention the Popover component with case-insensitive matching echo "Searching for documentation related to the Popover component (case-insensitive):" fd -e md -i | rg -i 'popover' # Additional Test: Search for any files containing 'Popover' in their names echo "Searching for any files with 'Popover' in the filename (case-insensitive):" fd 'popover' -iLength of output: 1136
web/ce/constants/project/settings/features.tsx (1)
2-2: Address unused import and improve import order.
- The
ListTodoimport is currently unused. Consider removing it if it's not needed for future implementations.- Reorder the imports to follow the convention: third-party imports should come before local imports.
Apply this diff to address these issues:
-import { FileText, Layers, ListTodo, Mail, Timer, Zap } from "lucide-react"; +import { FileText, Layers, Mail, Timer, Zap } from "lucide-react"; +import { IProject } from "@plane/types"; import { ContrastIcon, DiceIcon, Intake } from "@plane/ui"; -import { IProject } from "@plane/types";Also applies to: 4-4
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: lint-web
[warning] 2-2:
'ListTodo' is defined but never usedweb/core/components/project/settings/features-list.tsx (1)
102-106: Improved visual hierarchy for nested elementsThe addition of a wrapper div with
pl-14class for conditionally rendered children is a good improvement. It enhances the visual hierarchy and makes the relationship between parent and child elements clearer.Consider using a Tailwind class for consistent spacing across the application. For example, you could replace
pl-14with a custom class likepl-feature-childdefined in your Tailwind config. This would make it easier to maintain consistent spacing throughout the application.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- packages/ui/src/popovers/popover.tsx (2 hunks)
- packages/ui/src/popovers/types.ts (1 hunks)
- web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/inbox/layout.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/ce/components/projects/settings/intake/index.ts (1 hunks)
- web/ce/constants/project/settings/features.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/components/project/settings/features-list.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/ee/components/projects/settings/intake/index.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- web/ce/components/projects/settings/intake/index.ts
- web/ee/components/projects/settings/intake/index.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: lint-web
web/ce/constants/project/settings/features.tsx
[warning] 2-2:
'ListTodo' is defined but never used
[failure] 4-4:
@plane/typesimport should occur before import of@plane/ui
🔇 Additional comments (10)
packages/ui/src/popovers/types.ts (1)
8-8: Approved, but clarification neededThe addition of the
buttonRefClassNameproperty is technically sound and provides more flexibility for styling. However, it's not clear how this change relates to the PR objectives of adding issues through emails and forms.Could you please clarify how this change contributes to the feature of adding issues through emails and forms? This will help ensure that the change aligns with the PR objectives.
Additionally, consider adding a comment to explain the purpose of this new property:
export type TPopoverButtonDefaultOptions = { // button and button styling button?: ReactNode; buttonClassName?: string; + // Class name for the button reference element buttonRefClassName?: string; disabled?: boolean; };To verify the usage of this new property, let's run the following script:
This will help us understand if and how the new property is being used in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Verified Addition of
buttonRefClassNameThe
buttonRefClassNameproperty is correctly added and utilized within thepopover.tsxcomponent, enhancing styling flexibility without impacting existing functionalities.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of buttonRefClassName in the codebase # Search for buttonRefClassName usage echo "Searching for buttonRefClassName usage:" rg --type typescript --type javascript 'buttonRefClassName' # Search for TPopoverButtonDefaultOptions usage echo "Searching for TPopoverButtonDefaultOptions usage:" rg --type typescript --type javascript 'TPopoverButtonDefaultOptions'Length of output: 397
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Corrected script to check for usage of buttonRefClassName and TPopoverButtonDefaultOptions in the codebase # Search for buttonRefClassName usage echo "Searching for buttonRefClassName usage:" rg --type ts --type js 'buttonRefClassName' # Search for TPopoverButtonDefaultOptions usage echo "Searching for TPopoverButtonDefaultOptions usage:" rg --type ts --type js 'TPopoverButtonDefaultOptions'Length of output: 729
packages/ui/src/popovers/popover.tsx (1)
21-21: LGTM: New prop enhances styling flexibilityThe addition of the
buttonRefClassNameprop with a default empty string value is a good enhancement. It allows for custom styling of the button reference element while maintaining backward compatibility.web/ce/constants/project/settings/features.tsx (4)
6-18: Well-structured type definition for feature properties.The new
TPropertiestype provides a clear and comprehensive structure for defining feature properties. It enhances type safety and allows for optional custom rendering through therenderChildrenfunction.
19-21: Improved type definition for TFeatureList.The update to
TFeatureListtype, now using theTPropertiestype, enhances type safety and simplifies the overall type structure. This change promotes better maintainability and clarity in the codebase.
Line range hint
23-89: Consistent update of PROJECT_FEATURES_LIST to use new type structure.The
PROJECT_FEATURES_LISTconstant has been successfully updated to use the newTPropertiestype structure. This change maintains consistency with the type definitions and improves the overall type safety of the codebase.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: lint-web
[warning] 2-2:
'ListTodo' is defined but never used
[failure] 4-4:
@plane/typesimport should occur before import of@plane/ui
Line range hint
1-89: Overall assessment of changes in relation to PR objectives.The changes in this file improve the type definitions and structure for project features, which aligns with the PR objective of introducing a feature for adding issues to the intake system through emails and forms. While this file doesn't directly implement the email and form functionality, it provides the necessary groundwork by:
- Adding new icons (Mail, Zap) that could be used for the email intake feature.
- Improving the type structure, which will make it easier to add and manage new features like email intake.
- Maintaining the existing "Intake" feature in the
PROJECT_FEATURES_LIST, which could be extended or modified to include the new email functionality.To fully meet the PR objectives, ensure that the actual implementation of the email and form intake functionality is present in other files of this pull request.
To verify the implementation of the email intake feature, you can run the following script:
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: lint-web
[warning] 2-2:
'ListTodo' is defined but never used
[failure] 4-4:
@plane/typesimport should occur before import of@plane/uiweb/core/components/project/settings/features-list.tsx (4)
73-73: Improved layout structureThe removal of
flex,items-center, andjustify-betweenclasses from the outer div is a good change. It separates layout concerns and moves these properties to a more appropriate nested div (line 75). This change enhances the component's structure and maintainability.
75-91: Enhanced JSX structure and improved readabilityThe new nested structure for feature items is a significant improvement:
- It enhances the semantic meaning of the JSX.
- Provides better control over layout and spacing.
- The separate paragraph for the feature description improves readability.
These changes will make the component more maintainable and easier to style in the future.
95-101: Consistent layout adjustment for ToggleSwitchThe ToggleSwitch component is now properly integrated into the new layout structure. This change maintains the component's positioning while aligning with the overall structural improvements. Good job on ensuring consistency across the component.
73-106: Overall improvement in component structure and readabilityThe changes made to this component are primarily structural and stylistic, improving its overall maintainability and readability. The new structure provides better semantic meaning and layout control.
To ensure these changes haven't inadvertently affected the component's appearance, please verify the following:
- The layout of feature items is still correct and aligned as expected.
- The ToggleSwitch is properly positioned in relation to the feature item content.
- When children are rendered, they appear with the correct indentation and hierarchy.
Consider adding or updating visual regression tests for this component to catch any unintended layout changes in the future.
| // components | ||
| import { AppHeader, ContentWrapper } from "@/components/core"; | ||
| import { ProjectInboxHeader } from "./header"; | ||
| import { ProjectInboxHeader } from "@/plane-web/components/projects/settings/intake"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Incorrect import path for ProjectInboxHeader component.
The ProjectInboxHeader component is located at web/ce/components/projects/settings/intake/header.tsx, but the import statement in layout.tsx uses the path @/plane-web/components/projects/settings/intake. Unless there is an index.ts file in the intake directory that re-exports ProjectInboxHeader, this import path is incorrect.
Recommendations:
- Update the import path to
@/ce/components/projects/settings/intake/headerto accurately reflect the component's location. - Alternatively, add an
index.tsfile in theintakedirectory that re-exportsProjectInboxHeader, allowing the current import path to remain valid.
🔗 Analysis chain
Approve the change to absolute import, but clarification needed.
The switch from a relative import to an absolute import is a good practice that can improve code maintainability. However, I have a couple of questions:
-
The new import path includes "settings" (
@/plane-web/components/projects/settings/intake). Is this the correct location for a component used in the inbox layout? It seems counterintuitive to have an inbox-related component in a settings folder. -
How does this change relate to the PR objective of "enabling issues to be added to the intake system through emails and forms"? The current modification doesn't seem to directly address this feature.
To ensure the component is in the correct location, please run the following command:
This will help us confirm that the import path is correct and the component is appropriately placed in the project structure.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify the existence and location of the ProjectInboxHeader component
fd ProjectInboxHeader.tsx --type f
Length of output: 36
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Perform a case-insensitive search for ProjectInboxHeader.tsx
fd -i "ProjectInboxHeader.tsx" --type f
# Additionally, search for the component definition in .tsx files
rg "export\s+const\s+ProjectInboxHeader" --type=tsx
Length of output: 121
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Perform a case-insensitive search for ProjectInboxHeader.tsx
fd -i "ProjectInboxHeader.tsx" --type f
# Additionally, search for the component definition in .tsx files using a glob pattern
rg "export\s+const\s+ProjectInboxHeader" -g "*.tsx"
Length of output: 202
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/types/src/inbox.d.ts (2)
106-111: LGTM: New typeTInboxIssueFormis well-defined, with minor suggestions.The
TInboxIssueFormtype is well-structured and includes essential properties for issue submission via forms or emails. It aligns with the PR objective.Consider the following suggestions for potential improvements:
- Add optional fields for additional issue metadata (e.g., priority, labels).
- Consider using more specific types for email validation (e.g.,
EmailStringfrom a validation library).- Evaluate if any fields should be optional (e.g.,
usernamemight not always be available for email submissions).Would you like me to propose a revised type definition incorporating these suggestions?
99-111: Summary: New type definitions enhance inbox functionality.The additions of
TInboxFormandTInboxIssueFormtypes are well-aligned with the PR objective of allowing issues to be added to the intake system via emails and forms. These new types provide a solid foundation for type-checking and maintaining consistency in the inbox-related features.Consider creating a comprehensive set of types for the entire intake system, including potential future extensions like API integrations or third-party issue trackers. This proactive approach will ensure scalability and maintainability as the feature evolves.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
space/public/instance/success.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/types/src/inbox.d.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/types/src/inbox.d.ts (1)
100-104: LGTM: New typeTInboxFormlooks good.The
TInboxFormtype is well-structured and includes essential properties for form management. It aligns with the PR objective of adding forms for issue intake.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
web/ce/constants/project/settings/features.tsx (1)
6-18: LGTM: NewTPropertiestype enhances type safety and clarity.The new
TPropertiestype provides a clear structure for feature properties, which is beneficial for maintainability and type checking. The optionalrenderChildrenfunction is well-defined, allowing for flexible rendering of feature-specific UI components.Consider adding JSDoc comments to the
TPropertiestype for better documentation:/** * Represents the properties of a project feature. */ export type TProperties = { /** Unique identifier for the feature */ property: string; /** Display title of the feature */ title: string; /** Description of the feature */ description: string; /** Icon component for the feature */ icon: ReactNode; /** Indicates if the feature is a pro feature */ isPro: boolean; /** Indicates if the feature is currently enabled */ isEnabled: boolean; /** Optional function to render additional UI components for the feature */ renderChildren?: ( currentProjectDetails: IProject, isAdmin: boolean, handleSubmit: (featureKey: string, featureProperty: string) => Promise<void> ) => ReactNode; };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- web/ce/constants/project/settings/features.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
web/ce/constants/project/settings/features.tsx (3)
3-3: LGTM: Import statement addition is appropriate.The import of
IProjectfrom "@plane/types" is consistent with its usage in the newTPropertiestype definition.
19-21: LGTM:TFeatureListtype update improves code organization.The update to
TFeatureListtype, now using theTPropertiestype, enhances code organization and maintainability. This change is consistent with the overall refactoring effort and improves type safety.
Line range hint
1-91: Overall assessment: Changes improve type safety and code organization.The modifications in this file, including the new
TPropertiestype and the updatedTFeatureListtype, contribute to better type safety, code organization, and maintainability. These changes align well with the PR objectives of refactoring the intake system.To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's verify the usage of these new types:
✅ Verification successful
: The usage of
TPropertiesandTFeatureListis confined tofeatures.tsx, and there are no remaining inline type definitions similar toTPropertieselsewhere in the codebase. The changes are consistent and align with the PR objectives.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of new types across the codebase # Test 1: Check for usage of TProperties echo "Checking for usage of TProperties:" rg "TProperties" --type ts --type tsx # Test 2: Check for usage of updated TFeatureList echo "Checking for usage of updated TFeatureList:" rg "TFeatureList" --type ts --type tsx # Test 3: Check for any remaining inline definitions similar to TProperties echo "Checking for any remaining inline definitions similar to TProperties:" rg "type.*=.*\{.*property:.*string;.*title:.*string;.*description:.*string;" --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 585
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of new types across the codebase # Test 1: Check for usage of TProperties echo "Checking for usage of TProperties in .ts and .tsx files:" rg "TProperties" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" # Test 2: Check for usage of updated TFeatureList echo "Checking for usage of TFeatureList in .ts and .tsx files:" rg "TFeatureList" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" # Test 3: Check for any remaining inline definitions similar to TProperties echo "Checking for any remaining inline definitions similar to TProperties in .ts and .tsx files:" rg "type\s+\w+\s*=\s*\{\s*property:\s*string;\s*title:\s*string;\s*description:\s*string;" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"Length of output: 937
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
web/core/store/inbox/project-inbox.store.ts (3)
320-330: Consider enhancing error handling infetchIntakeForms.Currently, when an error occurs in
fetchIntakeForms, it logs an error message to the console. Consider updating an observable error property or providing user feedback to handle errors more gracefully.
332-344: Correct the error message and improve error handling intoggleIntakeForms.In the catch block of
toggleIntakeForms, the error message should reflect the operation being performed:- console.error("Error fetching the publish forms"); + console.error("Error updating the publish form");Additionally, consider updating an observable error property to inform the UI about the failure, providing better user feedback.
346-358: Correct the error message inregenerateIntakeForms.The error message in the catch block should accurately reflect the action:
- console.error("Error fetching the publish forms"); + console.error("Error regenerating the publish form");
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- web/core/store/inbox/project-inbox.store.ts (6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
web/core/store/inbox/project-inbox.store.ts (4)
15-15: ImportingTInboxFormis appropriate.The addition of
TInboxFormto the imports aligns with the new functionality and is correctly implemented.
73-75: New methods are correctly declared in the interface.The methods
fetchIntakeForms,toggleIntakeForms, andregenerateIntakeFormsare properly added to theIProjectInboxStoreinterface.
97-97: InitializingintakeFormsproperty appropriately.The
intakeFormsproperty is correctly initialized as an empty object, allowing for proper storage of intake forms per project.
112-112: DeclaringintakeFormsas an observable for MobX.Making
intakeFormsobservable ensures that changes to intake forms are tracked and reactive within the MobX store.
| inboxIssuePaginationInfo: TInboxIssuePaginationInfo | undefined; | ||
| inboxIssues: Record<string, IInboxIssueStore>; // issue_id -> IInboxIssueStore | ||
| inboxIssueIds: string[]; | ||
| intakeForms: Record<string, TInboxForm>; // Fix this |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Address the "// Fix this" comment.
The comment // Fix this indicates an unresolved issue or placeholder. Please resolve the issue or remove the comment before merging.
Summary
Added feature to allow issues to be added to intake via emails and forms
[WEB-2381]
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
buttonRefClassNamefor enhanced styling options in thePopovercomponent.Improvements
ProjectFeaturesListcomponent for better layout and organization.These changes aim to enhance user experience through improved styling flexibility and component organization.