Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

DOC: gallery supplies 2 pngs, neither of which is default #6636

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
efiring opened this issue Jun 23, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

DOC: gallery supplies 2 pngs, neither of which is default #6636

efiring opened this issue Jun 23, 2016 · 4 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@efiring
Copy link
Member

efiring commented Jun 23, 2016

The gallery generates a png and a high-res png, but neither is at the default dpi so neither shows what one would see if running the example directly.
I suggest simplifying the gallery to supply a single png at the default dpi.

@efiring efiring added this to the 2.0 (style change major release) milestone Jun 23, 2016
@tacaswell
Copy link
Member

👍

@afvincent
Copy link
Contributor

I would like to advocate for still supplying a high-res png in the gallery. Of course along with a png at the default dpi as @efiring suggested.

I often find it frustrating when I see a nice example in the gallery, with a part I want to to have a closer look, and that I have to copy-paste and run the source code on my computer to zoom in, instead of just displaying the higher-res png from the web gallery.

I don't know however if there is a bandwidth issue with supplying “high-res” files (like at 200 or 300 dpi instead of the default 100 dpi)…

@efiring
Copy link
Member Author

efiring commented Jul 5, 2016

Doesn't the pdf serve that purpose?

@afvincent
Copy link
Contributor

@efiring I apologize, lately I've been mainly looking at the devdocs version of the gallery, which only supplies “low-res” png files and I totally forgot that there is also a pdf on the non-devdocs gallery. In that case, why you suggested totally makes sense and my previous comment doesn't…

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants