Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Minor simplification to _pylab_helpers. #10090

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 28, 2017

Conversation

anntzer
Copy link
Contributor

@anntzer anntzer commented Dec 26, 2017

The module is private so it's fair game to directly get rid of
error_msg.

PR Summary

PR Checklist

  • Has Pytest style unit tests
  • Code is PEP 8 compliant
  • New features are documented, with examples if plot related
  • Documentation is sphinx and numpydoc compliant
  • Added an entry to doc/users/next_whats_new/ if major new feature (follow instructions in README.rst there)
  • Documented in doc/api/api_changes.rst if API changed in a backward-incompatible way

The module is private so it's fair game to directly get rid of
error_msg.
Copy link
Member

@efiring efiring left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

print(msg, file=sys.stderr)
import atexit
import gc
import sys
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm curious: why did you bother re-ordering these imports? The original order looks fine to me.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Keeping things in alphabetical order. A bit anal, I admit.

if f != manager:
cls._activeQue.append(f)

cls._activeQue.remove(manager)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The functional difference here is that the old code replaces the class attribute _activeQue, while the new code modifies the original. The only way I can see this would make a difference would be if there were other references to _activeQue. It doesn't look like that should occur; and if it did, I don't see how the replacement would be helpful. Therefore, I think this is OK.

if manager.canvas.figure == fig:
num = manager.num
break
num = next((manager.num for manager in six.itervalues(cls.figs)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's an interesting pattern.

@dopplershift dopplershift merged commit 45ebc85 into matplotlib:master Dec 28, 2017
@QuLogic QuLogic added this to the v2.2 milestone Dec 28, 2017
@anntzer anntzer deleted the pylab_helpers branch December 28, 2017 22:10
@QuLogic QuLogic modified the milestones: needs sorting, v2.2.0 Feb 12, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants