Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Backport: resolve conflict to get this into v2.2.3 #11811

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 4, 2018
Merged

Backport: resolve conflict to get this into v2.2.3 #11811

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 4, 2018

Conversation

jklymak
Copy link
Member

@jklymak jklymak commented Aug 4, 2018

PR Summary

Backport of #11330; conflict was minor....

PR Checklist

  • Has Pytest style unit tests
  • Code is PEP 8 compliant
  • New features are documented, with examples if plot related
  • Documentation is sphinx and numpydoc compliant
  • Added an entry to doc/users/next_whats_new/ if major new feature (follow instructions in README.rst there)
  • Documented in doc/api/api_changes.rst if API changed in a backward-incompatible way

@jklymak jklymak added this to the v2.2.3 milestone Aug 4, 2018
@jklymak jklymak added the topic: geometry manager LayoutEngine, Constrained layout, Tight layout label Aug 4, 2018
@jklymak jklymak force-pushed the backport-cl-overflow branch from de7228a to cc567ec Compare August 4, 2018 16:48
@jklymak jklymak force-pushed the backport-cl-overflow branch from cc567ec to 085bbd7 Compare August 4, 2018 16:48
@jklymak
Copy link
Member Author

jklymak commented Aug 4, 2018

Huh, I thought the csd error was fixed on v2.2.x... Fixing here...

@tacaswell tacaswell merged commit f822dba into matplotlib:v2.2.x Aug 4, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
topic: geometry manager LayoutEngine, Constrained layout, Tight layout
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v2.2.3
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@jklymak @tacaswell