Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Clarify tick collision API change doc. #13632

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 8, 2019

Conversation

anntzer
Copy link
Contributor

@anntzer anntzer commented Mar 8, 2019

PR Summary

Closes #13618 (thanks @ImportanceOfBeingErnest for the example).
Feel free to directly push edits.

PR Checklist

  • Has Pytest style unit tests
  • Code is Flake 8 compliant
  • New features are documented, with examples if plot related
  • Documentation is sphinx and numpydoc compliant
  • Added an entry to doc/users/next_whats_new/ if major new feature (follow instructions in README.rst there)
  • Documented in doc/api/api_changes.rst if API changed in a backward-incompatible way

@anntzer anntzer added Documentation Release critical For bugs that make the library unusable (segfaults, incorrect plots, etc) and major regressions. labels Mar 8, 2019
@anntzer anntzer added this to the v3.1.0 milestone Mar 8, 2019
@jklymak jklymak merged commit 7a4bf2b into matplotlib:master Mar 8, 2019
meeseeksmachine pushed a commit to meeseeksmachine/matplotlib that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2019
@anntzer anntzer deleted the tickcollision-doc branch March 8, 2019 21:12
jklymak added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2019
…632-on-v3.1.x

Backport PR #13632 on branch v3.1.x (Clarify tick collision API change doc.)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Documentation Release critical For bugs that make the library unusable (segfaults, incorrect plots, etc) and major regressions.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Minor ticklabels are missing at positions of major ticks.
3 participants