FIX: do not try to manage the visibility of un-drawn ticks #14056
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This reverts part of the changes from #13908 (in particular commit
e908efe ) that tried to manage the
visibility if the ticks that are not used. However, there was a bug
in this that nothing would ever set ticks to be visible
again. Because we currently cache / recycle ticks this meant that
panning / zooming or resizing the figure would eventually lose ticks
if the number of ticks ever went down and then back up.
We could fix this by adding a
tick.set_visible(True)
for the drawnticks, however this would break the (brittle) use case where users are
reaching in and manually setting the visibility of individual ticks to
False to hide them.
Instead, we revert the consistency code altogether and accept that
there will be
Tick
objects inAxis.majorTicks
andAxis.minorTicks
that are marked as visible, but are notdrawn (because they are filtered by
_update_ticks
).Closes #14054
PR Summary
PR Checklist