Thanks for this @jakeprojects !

I agree that having it in two places may be too much, but I think a bit more of the context from the FAQ should survive and we need to sort out why the docs build is failing (you can click through to download the logs). My suspicion is that there as a reference to that FAQ entry someplace which is now broken.

Discussion during call was that having that info at the bottom of the FAQ is probably not that useful; in fact anyone you do a search this already shows up at the top of the search page where many more people are going to see that; hence, dismissing @tacaswell's request-for-changes.
The doc build does still need to be fixed, though.

I've added a commit to fix the missing link. Please squash when merging (I didn't want to force-push to a foreign fork).