Simplify validate_color_for_prop_cycle. #16485
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
timhoffm
approved these changes
Feb 13, 2020
QuLogic
approved these changes
Mar 10, 2020
No need to special case bytes -- validate_colors is going to raise a TypeError on bytes input anyways (_is_nth_color checks that the input is str as well).
|
rebased |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No need to special case bytes -- validate_colors is going to raise a
TypeError on bytes input anyways (_is_nth_color checks that the input is
str as well).
PR Summary
PR Checklist