Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

DOC: recommend numpy random number generator class #23221

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 8, 2022

Conversation

rcomer
Copy link
Member

@rcomer rcomer commented Jun 8, 2022

PR Summary

A very minor suggestion for the developer guide. The Generator class is now numpy's recommended way of generating random numbers:
https://numpy.org/doc/stable/reference/random/index.html

PR Checklist

Tests and Styling

  • [N/A] Has pytest style unit tests (and pytest passes).
  • [N/A] Is Flake 8 compliant (install flake8-docstrings and run flake8 --docstring-convention=all).

Documentation

  • [N/A] New features are documented, with examples if plot related.
  • [N/A] New features have an entry in doc/users/next_whats_new/ (follow instructions in README.rst there).
  • [N/A]] API changes documented in doc/api/next_api_changes/ (follow instructions in README.rst there).
  • Documentation is sphinx and numpydoc compliant (the docs should build without error).

Copy link
Member

@jklymak jklymak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't do this much in the tests, yet. Its a pretty good first issue to go through and change most of them. People tend to read the existing tests before they will ever read this document.

@timhoffm timhoffm added this to the v3.6.0 milestone Jun 8, 2022
@timhoffm timhoffm merged commit c7defd7 into matplotlib:main Jun 8, 2022
@rcomer rcomer deleted the devel-random branch June 12, 2022 17:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants