Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

DOC: Fix broken cross-reference when building PDF #25088

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 26, 2023

Conversation

QuLogic
Copy link
Member

@QuLogic QuLogic commented Jan 26, 2023

PR Summary

Not sure why the original didn't work, perhaps because I need to use older sphinx-gallery to produce working PDF structures.

But this file has a target specified at the top, so use that instead. This fixed the PDF build for 3.7.0rc1.

PR Checklist

Documentation and Tests

  • [n/a] Has pytest style unit tests (and pytest passes)
  • Documentation is sphinx and numpydoc compliant (the docs should build without error).
  • [n/a] New plotting related features are documented with examples.

Release Notes

  • [n/a] New features are marked with a .. versionadded:: directive in the docstring and documented in doc/users/next_whats_new/
  • [n/a] API changes are marked with a .. versionchanged:: directive in the docstring and documented in doc/api/next_api_changes/
  • [n/a] Release notes conform with instructions in next_whats_new/README.rst or next_api_changes/README.rst

@QuLogic QuLogic added this to the v3.7.0 milestone Jan 26, 2023
@dstansby dstansby merged commit d772e0d into matplotlib:main Jan 26, 2023
meeseeksmachine pushed a commit to meeseeksmachine/matplotlib that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2023
@QuLogic QuLogic deleted the fix-pdf-ref branch January 27, 2023 00:06
@ksunden ksunden mentioned this pull request Feb 20, 2023
6 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants