[DOC] Clarify how to change side of the TickedStroke ticks #25394
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Summary
Took me a while and a bit of trial and error to figure it out.
The ant example in the doc-string is not that good since for plot, it seems like to points are reordered, so
plot([0, 1], [0, 1])
andplot([1, 0], [1, 0])
actually gives the same tick direction. I guess it is correct though, and that plot swaps when creating the line.One may argue if changing sign or adding/subtracting 180 is the "correct way", but I think that once one realize that it is the angle that one should modify, one can figure out the rest. (Changing sign of the length is also an option, but more limited and I do not think that has any actual advantage...)
Must of course not go into 3.7.2, but if it was only the example, it would probably go into 3.7-doc and so on.
PR Checklist
Documentation and Tests
pytest
passes)Release Notes
.. versionadded::
directive in the docstring and documented indoc/users/next_whats_new/
.. versionchanged::
directive in the docstring and documented indoc/api/next_api_changes/
next_whats_new/README.rst
ornext_api_changes/README.rst