-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.9k
Relational Operators for mathtext #25933
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Oscar Gustafsson <[email protected]>
Hi @tacaswell @anntzer @ksunden @QuLogic Could you please take a look at the patch? :) |
I'd suggest adding spaces so that the entries ends up in columns. The sorting and completeness is clearly a huge step over my PR! (Will not approve because of the relation to my earlier PR.) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Implementation looks good, I went and ran the original report code.
Could argue for test(s?) perhaps, but not too set on what granularity is needed (or if the new things need it if, there were already tests of other things in this list)
CI failures appear to be unrelated (Qt/macos tk, which have been addressed elsewhere)
I am surprised that this did not fail any tests! There is a wall of tests for mathtext: matplotlib/lib/matplotlib/tests/test_mathtext.py Lines 21 to 122 in f5f2cd9
Are these worth a whats new? |
There are a number of PRs that add and/or correct symbols, so maybe one should create a single What's new that can be appended? |
I have included some of the relational operators from the list in #26024. |
I think that at some stage before 3.8 there should be a What's new note in some form. Maybe not listing all the added symbols etc, but stating something more general. Then, this can be updated in the different PRs (for example, it doesn't really make sense to add a note for #26010 , but I can for sure add a line to an existing note about relational operators). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Although this is partly based on a very rudimentary initial PR from me, I think it has diverged enough so that I can fairly review it. (Especially given that nothing has happened in three weeks,)
PR summary
Fixes #25042
Closes #25045
Added mappings to binary operators missing Unicode ref
PR checklist