Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Remove ttconv backwards-compatibility code #30145

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 19, 2025

Conversation

QuLogic
Copy link
Member

@QuLogic QuLogic commented Jun 5, 2025

PR summary

When ttconv was replaced by pure Python code, several bits of compatibility code were left in in #18181. This removes those code chunks, as the test images will already be regenerated as part of the larger font work.

As this only affects PDF, and it's only minor rounding/duplicate vertices, the differences are generally only a single pixel for 1 character out of 3 or 4.

PR checklist

Copy link
Member

@oscargus oscargus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor thing that can be skipped to save CI, but other than that seems fine.

@QuLogic QuLogic moved this from Waiting for other PR to Ready for Review in Font and text overhaul Jun 5, 2025
@tacaswell
Copy link
Member

Please drop the last commit and self-merge.

@QuLogic QuLogic merged commit 7dafe63 into matplotlib:text-overhaul Jun 19, 2025
15 of 31 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Ready for Review to Done in Font and text overhaul Jun 19, 2025
@QuLogic QuLogic deleted the remove-ttconv branch June 19, 2025 18:49
@QuLogic
Copy link
Member Author

QuLogic commented Jun 19, 2025

Not going to wait for CI, because it's just going to fail, and then run again when merged, and fail there too...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants