Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

BLD: try to limit what coveralls looks at #6524

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

phobson
Copy link
Member

@phobson phobson commented Jun 1, 2016

No description provided.

@QuLogic
Copy link
Member

QuLogic commented Jun 1, 2016

Neither of the sample Python projects from coveralls use this other file; are you sure it's necessary?

@phobson
Copy link
Member Author

phobson commented Jun 1, 2016

Perhaps it's not. I picked up the practice from the statsmodels repo, but that dates back to 2013.

xarray uses just a plain .coveragerc with coveralls and started doing so early last year.

@jenshnielsen
Copy link
Member

I don't think the coverage has ever looked at the examples. The coverage in #6522 does not fail due to the change in your example but because it thinks a line has dropped coverage in colors.py I think it gets confused about which branch to compare against so we can just ignore it.

@tacaswell tacaswell modified the milestone: 2.1 (next point release) Jul 16, 2016
@phobson
Copy link
Member Author

phobson commented Aug 22, 2016

I don't think this PR accomplished what I thought it did and even it if did, it wouldn't be necessary.

closing it.

@phobson phobson closed this Aug 22, 2016
@QuLogic QuLogic modified the milestones: unassigned, 2.1 (next point release) Aug 22, 2016
@phobson phobson deleted the limit-coverage-scope branch October 14, 2016 17:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants