-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.9k
Revert "ENH: ship six 1.9.0" #6545
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
This reverts commit 8fe495a. Go back to using external six, to fix bug at matplotlib#6537. Also - update six required version to 1.10 Conflicts: lib/matplotlib/artist.py lib/matplotlib/axes/_base.py lib/matplotlib/backend_tools.py lib/matplotlib/backends/backend_mixed.py lib/matplotlib/backends/backend_pdf.py lib/matplotlib/backends/backend_svg.py lib/matplotlib/colors.py lib/matplotlib/dates.py lib/matplotlib/font_manager.py lib/matplotlib/legend_handler.py lib/matplotlib/tests/test_artist.py lib/matplotlib/tests/test_axes.py lib/matplotlib/tests/test_backend_qt5.py lib/matplotlib/tests/test_dviread.py lib/matplotlib/tests/test_image.py lib/matplotlib/tests/test_lines.py lib/matplotlib/tests/test_spines.py lib/matplotlib/textpath.py lib/mpl_toolkits/axes_grid/colorbar.py lib/mpl_toolkits/axes_grid1/anchored_artists.py lib/mpl_toolkits/axes_grid1/inset_locator.py
281fec6
to
792808e
Compare
I think the test failures are now unrelated. |
👍 I would merge this now, but I do not have time to backport it so will hold off on that. |
I'm happy to backport - you mean to the |
Yes to the 2.x branch. We are basically ready to cut 1.5.2 if we don't hear about any new issues so I think this is too high risk at the moment on 1.5.x and there will probably not be any 1.5 release after 1.5.2 |
devil's advocate here: the original reason for vendoring six was because of changes that were On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Jens Hedegaard Nielsen <
|
@WeatherGod I mostly recall the issue being bug reports where by people were getting mpl install without a working version of |
I think I was the original advocate for vendoring six. One of the arguments was to protect against new bugs in six, but it was always a fairly weak argument, because six is so widely used and stable now. I suppose another year of six gives some more evidence against that case, and conversely, #6537 is someone hitting a bug that has been fixed in six. So, I'm not saying it's completely cut and dried, but on balance I think unvendoring is better. |
closing in favor of #6556 This will land in master via one of the merge cascades. |
This reverts commit 8fe495a.
Go back to using external six, to fix bug at #6537.
Also - update six required version to 1.10
Conflicts:
lib/matplotlib/artist.py
lib/matplotlib/axes/_base.py
lib/matplotlib/backend_tools.py
lib/matplotlib/backends/backend_mixed.py
lib/matplotlib/backends/backend_pdf.py
lib/matplotlib/backends/backend_svg.py
lib/matplotlib/colors.py
lib/matplotlib/dates.py
lib/matplotlib/font_manager.py
lib/matplotlib/legend_handler.py
lib/matplotlib/tests/test_artist.py
lib/matplotlib/tests/test_axes.py
lib/matplotlib/tests/test_backend_qt5.py
lib/matplotlib/tests/test_dviread.py
lib/matplotlib/tests/test_image.py
lib/matplotlib/tests/test_lines.py
lib/matplotlib/tests/test_spines.py
lib/matplotlib/textpath.py
lib/mpl_toolkits/axes_grid/colorbar.py
lib/mpl_toolkits/axes_grid1/anchored_artists.py
lib/mpl_toolkits/axes_grid1/inset_locator.py